Wednesday, January 30, 2013

4 Reasons Leggings are not Pants

Have you see this ongoing trend? For the life of me, I can't understand why people keep wearing leggings as pants! 

1) Leggings are not pants...if they are see-through. Nothing that is see-through is pants.
I thought I'd just wear slightly invisible pants today
2) Leggings are not pants...if you can see the outline of your, get the idea.
3) Leggings are not pants...if they are tights. 
 Questionable "pants" set to 50% opacity 
4) Leggings are not pants...even if celebrities wear them. 
Me: eww.
If you, or anyone you know, suffers from the illusion that Leggings are Pants, please provide them with the 5-step program "how to adequately and sufficiently cover my behind with clothing called Pants" located in the Duh Lol Clothing 101 class.  Class fees cover peanuts and appropriate slide-show.

Or you could just send them this info-graphic.


Mindy said...

HAHA! Agreed!!

anna lizbeth said...

man those are bad!! ahha love the post! xo annalizbeth

deanna@delirious-rhapsody said... hilton wore that in public? that's horrible.

Unknown said...

Love this! stopping by from Thirsty Thursday, come by and visit, too, please

Kendra said...

What if I have fleece leggings and they don't have any of that??? They're all I wear! Haha.

Teh Megan said...

THIS. OMG YES. I want this on a card I can hand out to those (insert a name nicer than what I was going to use) who can't seem to figure out that a t-shirt and leggings is COMPLETELY unacceptable. It's like wearing a belly shirt in the winter.. ok or all the time..

Anonymous said...

Situated at the fringe of short distance to city, Sant
Ritz at Potong Pasir (Singapore) in District 13. the interlace

Rosario said...

That's all I wear as well fleece lined footless tights from Ricki's.